TickerJury runs each stock past twelve specialist agents — each with a distinct mandate — then has a Judge reconcile their verdicts and an Architect size a sensible portfolio. It's a structured way to get twelve second opinions before you commit capital.
Try it out → Access is currently limited to a small group of testers.Three stages, one pipeline. You give it tickers and a budget; it returns verdicts, reasoning, and a sized portfolio.
Twelve agents examine each ticker independently — fundamentals, charts, sentiment, macro, risk, liquidity, peers, behavior, regulation, valuation, catalysts, and long-term thesis.
A synthesizing agent reads all twelve memos, weighs disagreements, and produces a single verdict per ticker with the reasoning made explicit.
A portfolio agent turns the verdicts into an allocation inside your budget — including a CASH row when nothing warrants full deployment.
Each juror has a narrow mandate and a distinct lens. The point isn't consensus — it's seeing where the lenses disagree.
Fundamentals Analyst
Earnings quality, revenue growth, balance-sheet strength, cash flow.
Technical Pattern Spotter
Chart patterns, volume, momentum, support and resistance.
Sentiment Gauge
News tone, social chatter, analyst-rating momentum.
Macro Watchdog
How current rates, inflation, and geopolitics hit this sector.
Risk Quant
Historical volatility, beta, drawdown scenarios, tail risk.
Liquidity Scout
Daily volume, bid-ask spread, float, exit ease at position size.
Sector Comparator
Relative valuation vs peers, competitive position, share trends.
Behavioral Auditor
Hype, crowded-trade signals, FOMO indicators, contrarian flags.
Regulatory Scanner
Active lawsuits, compliance risk, pending regulation, contract exposure.
Valuation Skeptic
PE, price-to-sales, steelman the bear case on multiples.
Catalysts Hunter
Earnings dates, launches, M&A rumors, 90-day catalysts.
Long-term Horizon
3-5 year growth thesis, competitive moat, secular trends.
A sized portfolio table with a one-line rationale per position — and an explicit CASH row when the jury says to hold back.
| Ticker | Verdict | Allocation | One-line rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | BUY | $1,800 | Fundamentals + catalysts strong; risk quant flags vol but thesis holds. |
| AAPL | HOLD | $1,200 | Valuation skeptic dissents; sector and long-term jurors support a core position. |
| XYZ | SKIP | $0 | Liquidity scout and regulatory scanner both flag material concerns. |
| CASH | — | $2,000 | Held back; judge saw no high-conviction setup for the remaining budget. |