TickerJury: orthogonal views, unified signal, disciplined capital deployment.

Try it out → Access is currently limited to a small group of testers.

How it works

Three stages, one pipeline. You give it tickers and a budget; it returns verdicts, reasoning, and a sized portfolio.

Stage 1

The Jury deliberates

Twelve agents examine each ticker independently — fundamentals, charts, sentiment, macro, risk, liquidity, peers, behavior, regulation, valuation, catalysts, and long-term thesis.

Stage 2

The Judge reconciles

A synthesizing agent reads all twelve memos, weighs disagreements, and produces a single verdict per ticker with the reasoning made explicit.

Stage 3

The Architect sizes

A portfolio agent turns the verdicts into an allocation inside your budget — including a CASH row when nothing warrants full deployment.

What you get back

A sized portfolio table with a one-line rationale per position — and an explicit CASH row when the jury says to hold back.

Portfolio — budget $5,000  ·  4 tickers analyzed
TickerVerdictAllocationOne-line rationale
NVDABUY$1,800Fundamentals + catalysts strong; risk quant flags vol but thesis holds.
AAPLHOLD$1,200Valuation skeptic dissents; sector and long-term jurors support a core position.
XYZSKIP$0Liquidity scout and regulatory scanner both flag material concerns.
CASH$2,000Held back; judge saw no high-conviction setup for the remaining budget.